aureliencoiffard.com – Full Analysis

• Author
• Recent Posts

Joma

I am a programmer with expertise in Python, Flask, Javascript, HTML/CSS and both frontend and backend web development. I am sole the owner of DegaoTech and am solely responsible for putting together website profiles that you see here. As a tech enthusiast, I also spend some time writing about and reviewing software at OutwitTrade.com.

Pronouns: He/Him/His

Latest posts by Joma (see all)

• acwr.net – Full Analysis - March 6, 2021
• merithealthwesley.com – Full Analysis - March 6, 2021
• omidfoundation.com – Full Analysis - March 6, 2021

Aur̩lien Coiffard РWeb Addict / Photographies / Musique

(Took us an average of 0.6 seconds to load)

Basic information for aureliencoiffard.com

About: Un web addict qui aime la simplicité la musique et la photographie.

Email or contact page: https://aureliencoiffard.com/contact.html

Social media profiles:

• https://instagram.com/aureliencoi
• https://twitter.com/aureliencoi

Using HTTPS: Yes 🙂

Whois information

HTML errors found on homepage

Popular words

Pagespeed analysis

OVERALL SITE SPEED: AVERAGE (details below)

CUMULATIVE LAYOUT SHIFT SCORE: AVERAGE. Have you ever been reading an article online when something suddenly changes on the page? Without warning, the text moves, and you’ve lost your place. Or even worse: you’re about to tap a link or a button, but in the instant before your finger lands—BOOM—the link moves, and you end up clicking something else! This is a measure of how often this is happening on your website.

FIRST CONTENTFUL PAINT MS SCORE: AVERAGE. This measures the time taken for the first thing on your website to load when a visitor goes there.

FIRST INPUT DELAY MS SCORE: AVERAGE. How long it takes for your website to react if the user interacts with it in some way, such as clicking a link or button.

LARGEST CONTENTFUL PAINT MS SCORE: AVERAGE. Measures how long the main part of the website takes to load.

Opportunities for improvement

Avoid serving legacy JavaScript to modern browsers: Polyfills and transforms enable legacy browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren’t necessary for modern browsers. For your bundled JavaScript, adopt a modern script deployment strategy using module/nomodule feature detection to reduce the amount of code shipped to modern browsers, while retaining support for legacy browsers. [Learn More](https://philipwalton.com/articles/deploying-es2015-code-in-production-today/)
Potential savings of 22 KiB

Minify JavaScript: Minifying JavaScript files can reduce payload sizes and script parse time. [Learn more](https://web.dev/unminified-javascript/).
Potential savings of 8 KiB

Remove unused CSS: Remove dead rules from stylesheets and defer the loading of CSS not used for above-the-fold content to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity. [Learn more](https://web.dev/unused-css-rules/).
Potential savings of 18 KiB

Eliminate render-blocking resources: Resources are blocking the first paint of your page. Consider delivering critical JS/CSS inline and deferring all non-critical JS/styles. [Learn more](https://web.dev/render-blocking-resources/).
Potential savings of 530 ms

Remove duplicate modules in JavaScript bundles: Remove large, duplicate JavaScript modules from bundles to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity.
Potential savings of 1 KiB

Remove unused JavaScript: Remove unused JavaScript to reduce bytes consumed by network activity. [Learn more](https://web.dev/unused-javascript/).
Potential savings of 56 KiB

Internal pages [TOP 20]

External homepage links [TOP 20]