(Took us an average of 1.2 seconds to load)
|Table of Contents|
|Minor HTML issues found on homepage|
|How can this website be improved?|
|Websites linked to|
Basic information for thecenternow.org
About: Building Healthy Relationships, Families, & Communities
Email: nicolec (at) thecenternow (dot) org
Social media profiles:
Using HTTPS: Yes 🙂
HTML errors found on homepage
Duplicate attribute “id”.
per --> <style type="text/css" media="screen"></styl
Element “style” not allowed as child of element “body” in this context. (Suppressing further errors from this subtree.)
OVERALL SITE SPEED: AVERAGE (details below)
CUMULATIVE LAYOUT SHIFT SCORE: AVERAGE. Have you ever been reading an article online when something suddenly changes on the page? Without warning, the text moves, and you’ve lost your place. Or even worse: you’re about to tap a link or a button, but in the instant before your finger lands, BOOM – the link moves, and you end up clicking something else! This is a measure of how often this is happening on your website.
FIRST CONTENTFUL PAINT MS SCORE: AVERAGE. This measures the time taken for the first thing on your website to load when a visitor goes there.
FIRST INPUT DELAY MS SCORE: AVERAGE. How long it takes for your website to react if the user interacts with it in some way, such as clicking a link or button.
LARGEST CONTENTFUL PAINT MS SCORE: AVERAGE. Measures how long the main part of the website takes to load.
Opportunities for improvement
Properly size images: Serve images that are appropriately-sized to save cellular data and improve load time.
Potential savings of 145 KiB
Potential savings of 8 KiB
Eliminate render-blocking resources: Resources are blocking the first paint of your page. Consider delivering critical JS/CSS inline and deferring all non-critical JS/styles.
Potential savings of 610 ms
Avoid multiple page redirects: Redirects introduce additional delays before the page can be loaded.
Potential savings of 230 ms
Reduce unused CSS: Reduce unused rules from stylesheets and defer CSS not used for above-the-fold content to decrease bytes consumed by network activity.
Potential savings of 149 KiB
Efficiently encode images: Optimized images load faster and consume less cellular data.
Potential savings of 57 KiB
Serve images in next-gen formats: Image formats like JPEG 2000, JPEG XR, and WebP often provide better compression than PNG or JPEG, which means faster downloads and less data consumption.
Potential savings of 212 KiB